Lou Stringer -- 2B
AVG OBP SLG
0.246 /
0.324 /
0.352
HR OPS WAR
5 /
0.676 /
2.2
| Year | Name | Team | POS | Age | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | SF | HBP | wOBA | WAR | Awards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1941 | Lou Stringer | CHC | 2B | 24 | 145 | 581 | 512 | 59 | 126 | 31 | 4 | 5 | 53 | 3 | 0 | 59 | 86 | 0.246 | 0.324 | 0.352 | 0.676 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0.320 | 2.2 | |
| 1942 | Lou Stringer | CHC | 2B | 25 | 121 | 448 | 406 | 45 | 96 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 31 | 55 | 0.236 | 0.292 | 0.352 | 0.644 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 0.307 | 1.1 | |
| 1946 | Lou Stringer | CHC | 2B | 29 | 80 | 243 | 209 | 26 | 51 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 | 0.244 | 0.328 | 0.311 | 0.639 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0.312 | 0.0 | |
| 1948 | Lou Stringer | BOS | 2B | 31 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.091 | 0.091 | 0.364 | 0.455 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.194 | -0.1 | |
| 1949 | Lou Stringer | BOS | 2B | 32 | 35 | 46 | 41 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0.268 | 0.348 | 0.439 | 0.787 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0.365 | 0.2 | |
| 1950 | Lou Stringer | BOS | 2B | 33 | 24 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.353 | 0.647 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.295 | -0.1 | |
| Totals | 409 | 1346 | 1196 | 148 | 290 | 49 | 10 | 19 | 122 | 7 | 0 | 121 | 192 | 0.242 | 0.313 | 0.348 | 0.661 | 416 | 0 | 1 | - | 3.3 | |||||
2019 Team Run Scoring Distribution - AL Central
In what is becomming outdated current research, this series showcases the frequency team's score 1, 2, 3 or 10 runs.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-16
Franchise Top 5 HR Seasons By Position
Featuring every Franchise's Top 5 Homerun seasons at every position.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Ronald Acuna and the 13 Who Almost Went 40/40
These 13 batters came impossibly close to a 40 HR - 40 Stolen base season.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Newspeak on Stars: The Best at Narrow Margins
What season had the lowest OPS and OPS+ to lead MLB? The lowest plusgood.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
