Matthew den Dekker -- OF
AVG OBP SLG
0.207 /
0.270 /
0.276
HR OPS WAR
1 /
0.546 /
0.0
| Year | Name | Team | POS | Age | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | SF | HBP | wOBA | WAR | Awards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Matthew den Dekker | NYM | OF | 25 | 27 | 63 | 58 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 0.207 | 0.270 | 0.276 | 0.546 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0 | |
| 2014 | Matthew den Dekker | NYM | OF | 26 | 53 | 174 | 152 | 23 | 38 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 0.250 | 0.345 | 0.322 | 0.667 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0.307 | 1.0 | |
| 2015 | Matthew den Dekker | WSN | OF | 27 | 55 | 110 | 99 | 12 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 0.253 | 0.315 | 0.485 | 0.800 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0.343 | 0.4 | |
| 2016 | Matthew den Dekker | WSN | OF | 28 | 19 | 39 | 34 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 0.176 | 0.282 | 0.294 | 0.576 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.263 | 0.1 | |
| 2017 | Matthew den Dekker | DET | OF | 29 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0.143 | 0.250 | 0.143 | 0.393 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.196 | 0.0 | |
| 2018 | Matthew den Dekker | NYM | OF | 30 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0.000 | 0.095 | 0.000 | 0.095 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.066 | -0.5 | |
| Totals | 166 | 415 | 368 | 46 | 82 | 19 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 12 | 6 | 41 | 100 | 0.223 | 0.305 | 0.337 | 0.642 | 124 | 1 | 3 | - | 1 | |||||
2019 Team Run Scoring Distribution - AL Central
In what is becomming outdated current research, this series showcases the frequency team's score 1, 2, 3 or 10 runs.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-16
Franchise Top 5 HR Seasons By Position
Featuring every Franchise's Top 5 Homerun seasons at every position.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Ronald Acuna and the 13 Who Almost Went 40/40
These 13 batters came impossibly close to a 40 HR - 40 Stolen base season.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Newspeak on Stars: The Best at Narrow Margins
What season had the lowest OPS and OPS+ to lead MLB? The lowest plusgood.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
