Rich Rowland -- C,1B,3B
AVG OBP SLG
0.158 /
0.238 /
0.211
HR OPS WAR
0 /
0.449 /
-0.3
| Year | Name | Team | POS | Age | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | SF | HBP | wOBA | WAR | Awards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Rich Rowland | DET | C,1B,3B | 26 | 7 | 21 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0.158 | 0.238 | 0.211 | 0.449 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.191 | -0.3 | |
| 1991 | Rich Rowland | DET | C,1B,3B | 27 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.333 | 0.250 | 0.583 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.269 | 0.0 | |
| 1992 | Rich Rowland | DET | C,1B,3B | 28 | 6 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.214 | 0.353 | 0.214 | 0.567 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.286 | -0.1 | |
| 1993 | Rich Rowland | DET | C,1B,3B | 29 | 21 | 52 | 46 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 0.217 | 0.294 | 0.283 | 0.577 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0.269 | -0.2 | |
| 1994 | Rich Rowland | BOS | C,1B,3B | 30 | 46 | 129 | 118 | 14 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 35 | 0.229 | 0.295 | 0.483 | 0.778 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0.333 | 0.4 | |
| 1995 | Rich Rowland | BOS | C,1B,3B | 31 | 14 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.207 | 0.379 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.168 | -0.3 | |
| Totals | 98 | 254 | 230 | 22 | 49 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 71 | 0.213 | 0.281 | 0.365 | 0.646 | 84 | 1 | 0 | - | -0.5 | |||||
2019 Team Run Scoring Distribution - AL Central
In what is becomming outdated current research, this series showcases the frequency team's score 1, 2, 3 or 10 runs.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-16
Franchise Top 5 HR Seasons By Position
Featuring every Franchise's Top 5 Homerun seasons at every position.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Ronald Acuna and the 13 Who Almost Went 40/40
These 13 batters came impossibly close to a 40 HR - 40 Stolen base season.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
Newspeak on Stars: The Best at Narrow Margins
What season had the lowest OPS and OPS+ to lead MLB? The lowest plusgood.
By Tom Wike | 2025-06-15
